No. Surveys collect opinions and average them. The diagnostics compute findings from your data — financials, contracts, calendars, org structures — and cite each finding to its source. Opinion enters only where it’s scored against observable behavior.
Because a company is as fragile as its worst exposure, not its average one. A blended score would hide precisely the finding you paid to see. We report each dimension, ranked by dollar impact.
The diagnostics hand you a sequenced plan with owners and definitions of done. Mentoring, the Mirror, and the add-on engagements carry it forward if you want us in the work — but the diagnostic stands alone, and plenty of clients run the plan with their own team.
No, no, no, and no — by design. The independence is what makes the findings worth paying for.
It’s built to. Every figure is computed from your data, sourced to the line it came from, and tested against a named threshold. Hand the report to the toughest reader you know — that’s what it’s for.
A structured intake, defined document requests (scoped per engagement), and your leadership’s participation in the working sessions. Client-side time concentrates in the intake window; analysis is ours and doesn’t draw on your calendar.
Free instruments cost nothing. Paid engagements run from $4.5K (Hiring Blueprint) to custom institutional work above $500K. Every price on this site is the rack rate — what’s printed is what it costs, and any discount appears on your documents as a named Engagement Credit.
Yes — full delivery in neutral Latin American Spanish, USD pricing, across Latin America.